Coindre Hall Boathouse Work Leads to Opposition

The future of the dilapidated boathouse at Coindre Hall has community activists opposing plans and the work that has gone on so far at the Suffolk County park.

Environmental Conservation police from the state Department of Environmental Conservation advised the individuals working at the site to stop work until DEC completes its investigation regarding any necessary permits beyond the required DEC permit for bulkhead reconstruction work that is already in place.

Among other issues, activists are complaining that wetland vegetation has been improperly removed.

Suffolk County Legislator Dr. William “Doc” Spencer, however, said vegetation, including the invasive reed grass phragmities, has been cleared away from the boathouse area but the primary work involves preparations to repair a damaged seawall.

Spencer, D-Huntington, leads an advisory board that is meeting to review ideas for the area.

Community activists say that unauthorized demolition of wetlands on lower 12 acres of Coindre Hall Park was going on and that cattails had been removed improperly. Activists who visited the park last week alerted the DEC.

The advisory committee, Spencer said, doesn’t have power to make changes and that the ultimate decision lies with the county parks commission. He notes that the area also has a historical designation. “We can’t do a lot of things people are suggesting,” he said. Members of the committee include representatives of Suffolk County, the Town of Huntington, a boating club, baymen and a dogs group.

He said that  “One of issues is that the boathouse is literally falling into the water…We have restoration people to make sure it’s restored correctly. There were vines, weeds, kids were breaking in, graffiti” at the boathouse. He said the county is working with arborists, including the May Tree Service  to ensure proper work.

“Our goal is to revitalize, not redevelop,” he said.

What activists fear is that the area around the boathouse will be turned into a restaurant or other commercial site, and point to a Newsday article in March 2020 where Spencer discussed such possibilities as a drone landing site or boardwalk.

Desiree Benn, a resident who said she stumbled on the work at the park, said, “Decisions were made about a public park without public input. The bulldozers just arrived. There is a plan that they are following… But how can people who are not elected and do not use the park every day decide on the aesthetic?”

Members of the parks advisory committee are: Kathleen Cleary, Garrett Chelius, Shameika Hanson, Keith Larsen, Richard Martin, Ian Milligan, Herb Morrow, Ginny Munger-Kahn, Charlie Murphy, Joseph W. Ryan, Jr. and Jerome Wood.

The advisory committee next meets Aug.10, 4-6 p.m., at Coindre Hall.

8 Replies to “Coindre Hall Boathouse Work Leads to Opposition”

  1. I recognize a few names on the committee that are political people and not users of the boathouse or even environmentally aware. I used to row out of Coindre Hall and it was a wonderful place for students to learn the sport in protected waters. The sport sends many kids to college with scholarships and builds an understanding of working as part of a team. I don’t know how these people got appointed to this committee, but they really should have an understanding of the natural environment, revitalization and history. Maybe some do, but when we politicize restoration of an historic boathouse, then we really are in trouble.

  2. All the current land clearing and tree cutting in the guise of the boat house restoration is a smoke screen. If fact 90% of the work already done has no impact on the status of the boat house. The clearing has done nothing but destroy valuable deer and other wild life habitation ,cause environment concerns to a level that the DEC put a temporary stop work order in place. and eliminate walking trails used by many residents daily. All this is supposedly part of a three phase plan to restore the park, yet no plan has been proposed to the public and no public input was sought before work began. There is an old saying : what starts of bad ends bad. This has all the smells of another government boondoggle. We need answers, transparency and accountability for the damage already done. Who will benefit from this so called restoration? Follow the money.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.